Indicates a research-demonstrated benefit
Overview
Conceptual exercises that present learners with a series of pictures or diagrams that describe several slightly different variations of a basic physical situation. Students are then asked to make a comparative judgment and to identify the order or ranking of the various situations based on some physical outcome or result. The multiple scenarios engage students' minds and force them to think more deeply about the critical features that distinguish one situation from another.
| Type of Method | Curriculum supplement | |
|---|---|---|
| Level |
Designed for:
Astronomy |
|
| Setting |
Designed for:
Lecture - Large (30+ students) Can be adapted for: Recitation/Discussion Session, Homework, Studio |
|
| Coverage | Many topics with less depth | |
| Topics | Astronomy | |
| Instructor Effort | Low | |
| Skills |
Designed for:
Conceptual understanding of physics content Can be adapted for: Enjoyment of physics |
|
| Research Validation |
Based on research into:
how students learn Demonstrated to improve: scores on multiple choice conceptual tests Studied using: conceptual pre/post exams |
|
| Compatible Methods | Peer Instruction, PhET, JiTT, CGPS, Physlets, Context-Rich Problems, SCALE-UP, OSP, LA Program, CAE TPS, Lecture-Tutorials, CPU, TEFA, Tutorials, Clickers | |
| Similar Methods | Ranking Tasks, TIPERs, Lecture-Tutorials | |
| Developer(s) | David Hudgins, Kevin Lee, and Edward Prather | |
| Website | http://astro.unl.edu/interactives/ |





