Materials Similar to Force concept inventory

• 84%: The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory
• 82%: Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller
• 82%: What does the force concept inventory actually measure?
• 82%: The effect of distracters on student performance on the Force Concept Inventory
• 81%: Differences in Male/Female Response Patterns on Alternative-format Versions of the Force Concept Inventory
• 81%: Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory
• 81%: Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency
• 81%: Experimental validation of the half-length Force Concept Inventory
• 80%: Racial and ethnic bias in the Force Concept Inventory
• 78%: The Force Concept Inventory: A tool for monitoring student learning
• 78%: Comparing large lecture mechanics curricula using the Force Concept Inventory: A five thousand student study
• 78%: Common Concerns About the Force Concept Inventory
• 74%: Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory
• 74%: Dividing the Force Concept Inventory into two equivalent half-length tests
• 74%: Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen’s d for Force Concept Inventory results in an introductory mechanics course
• 73%: Developing the Lunar Phases Concept Inventory
• 72%: Interpreting force concept inventory scores: Normalized gain and SAT scores
• 70%: Rasch model based analysis of the Force Concept Inventory
• 70%: Gender bias in the force concept inventory?